Application note · Chemicals & Materials

Moisture and Colour in Formulated Materials

Moisture and colour are the two cheapest release checks in formulated materials, and the two most often performed inconsistently. Here is what each method actually measures and how to make the numbers comparable.

Yoke Application Team · Reviewed by Yoke Application Team · Updated October 22, 2026 · 3 min read

The short answer

  • Loss on drying measures everything volatile at the test temperature; Karl Fischer measures water specifically. The specification has to name which one it means.
  • Colour by visual comparison fails when the lighting or the observer changes; an instrument removes the observer but adds cell and temperature requirements.
  • A tolerance narrower than the method scatter produces rejections that are really measurement noise.

Two measurements decide more release decisions in formulated materials than any other pair, and neither is expensive: how much volatile the material still holds, and whether its colour matches the reference. Both are simple to perform and easy to perform inconsistently, which is why they cause a disproportionate share of disputes.

Two cheap measurements, one release decision

A batch that is inside its moisture limit and outside its colour tolerance is not released. A batch that is inside both is usually released without further testing. That makes the pair a gate, and a gate has to be defined in numbers that two operators would interpret the same way.

Moisture: what the method actually measures

Loss on drying measures everything that evaporates at the test temperature — water, residual solvent, and in some materials a fraction that is neither. Karl Fischer measures water specifically. The two agree only when water is the only volatile present, and choosing between them is a statement about what the specification means.

If the specification says “water content”, use Karl Fischer. If it says “loss on drying”, use the moisture analyser and accept that the number includes other volatiles. Using one method to demonstrate the other is a common and avoidable finding in an audit.

Colour: from visual to instrumental

Visual comparison against a reference sample is fast, needs no instrument, and fails as soon as the lighting or the observer changes. Instrumental measurement — transmittance at a fixed wavelength, or a platinum-cobalt scale for clear liquids — removes the observer but introduces its own requirements: a fixed cell path, a clean cell and a defined sample temperature.

Making the numbers comparable

Measurement Common error Control that fixes it
Moisture by loss on drying Portion too small, so the result scatters Fixed portion mass, recorded with the result
Moisture by loss on drying Temperature programme copied between materials One programme per material, verified on a known sample
Colour by transmittance Cell path or cell cleanliness differs between operators One cell per product, cleaned and checked at the start of the shift
Colour by comparison Lighting and background vary A defined viewing station, or move to an instrument

Setting a specification you can hold

A specification is only useful if the method can resolve it. Set the limit from the process capability first, then check that the method’s repeatability is comfortably smaller than the tolerance. A tolerance of 0.1 percent measured by a method that scatters by 0.15 percent generates rejections that are really measurement noise.

Where the two interact

Moisture and colour are not independent. Drying can concentrate colour bodies, heat can darken a heat-sensitive material, and a moist powder scatters light differently from a dry one. When both measurements sit near their limits at once, the useful next step is to measure them on the same portion rather than on two samples taken minutes apart.

Instruments used in this note.

The configuration described above, with the full specification of each model.

Questions about this method.

Which moisture method should a specification name?

The one that measures the quantity the process cares about. If the concern is water specifically — a hydrate, a reaction, a microbial risk — name Karl Fischer. If the concern is total volatile at process temperature, name loss on drying and state the temperature and time.

Why does the same batch read differently on two moisture analysers?

Different temperature programmes, different portion masses and different drying rates. Two instruments with the same model number will disagree if the programme and the portion differ, which is why the programme belongs in the procedure rather than in the operator's memory.

Is a colorimeter necessary if we already compare visually?

Necessary when colour is a specification item that can trigger a rejection, because a visual decision cannot be defended or reproduced. For internal trend monitoring a defined viewing station is often enough.

More notes on this application.

All notes

Let’s talk about your application

Check the configuration against your method.

Send the sample, the concentration range and the reference method. We will confirm the instrument and the accessories.

Contact our team